Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 2b162ccb authored by Markus Armbruster's avatar Markus Armbruster
Browse files

qapi-types: Convert to QAPISchemaVisitor, fixing flat unions


Fixes flat unions to get the base's base members.  Test case is from
commit 2fc00432, in qapi-schema-test.json:

    { 'union': 'UserDefFlatUnion',
      'base': 'UserDefUnionBase',
      'discriminator': 'enum1',
      'data': { 'value1' : 'UserDefA',
                'value2' : 'UserDefB',
                'value3' : 'UserDefB' } }

    { 'struct': 'UserDefUnionBase',
      'base': 'UserDefZero',
      'data': { 'string': 'str', 'enum1': 'EnumOne' } }

    { 'struct': 'UserDefZero',
      'data': { 'integer': 'int' } }

Patch's effect on UserDefFlatUnion:

     struct UserDefFlatUnion {
         /* Members inherited from UserDefUnionBase: */
    +    int64_t integer;
         char *string;
         EnumOne enum1;
         /* Own members: */
         union { /* union tag is @enum1 */
             void *data;
             UserDefA *value1;
             UserDefB *value2;
             UserDefB *value3;
         };
     };

Flat union visitors remain broken.  They'll be fixed next.

Code is generated in a different order now, but that doesn't matter.

The two guards QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN_STRUCT_DECL and
QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN_CLEANUP_DECL are replaced by just
QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN.

Two ugly special cases for simple unions now stand out like sore
thumbs:

1. The type tag is named 'type' everywhere, except in generated C,
   where it's 'kind'.

2. QAPISchema lowers simple unions to semantically equivalent flat
   unions.  However, the C generated for a simple unions differs from
   the C generated for its equivalent flat union, and we therefore
   need special code to preserve that pointless difference for now.

Mark both TODO.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
parent 156402e5
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment