Commit dc99065b (v0.1.0) added dis-asm.h from binutils.

Commit 43d4145a (v0.1.5) inlined bfd.h into dis-asm.h to remove the
dependency on binutils.

Commit 76cad711 (v1.4.0) moved dis-asm.h to include/disas/bfd.h.
The new name is confusing when you try to match against (pre GPLv3+)
binutils.  Rename it back.  Keep it in the same directory, of course.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190417191805.28198-17-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>

This causes a build error with debian sid, riscv64 host:

disas/microblaze.c:179: error: "REG_SP" redefined [-Werror]
 #define REG_SP  1 /* stack pointer */

In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:306,
                 from include/qemu/osdep.h:101,
                 from disas/microblaze.c:36:
/usr/include/riscv64-linux-gnu/sys/ucontext.h:36: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 # define REG_SP 2

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

Making the opcode list 'const' saves memory.
Some function arguments and local variables needed 'const', too.

Add also 'static' to two local functions.

Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
[EI: Removed old prototypes to fix the build]
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>

The REG_PC define in disas/microblaze.c clashes with a define in
the Linux SPARC system headers:

/home/pm215/qemu/disas/microblaze.c:162:0: error: "REG_PC" redefined [-Werror]
 #define REG_PC  32 /* PC */

In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:326:0,
                 from /home/pm215/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:86,
                 from /home/pm215/qemu/disas/microblaze.c:36:
/usr/include/sparc64-linux-gnu/sys/ucontext.h:96:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 #define REG_PC  (1)

Since the code doesn't actually use the REG_PC define
anywhere, the simplest fix is just to remove it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 1490272961-1128-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org

In read_insn_microblaze() we assemble 4 bytes into an 'unsigned
long'.  If 'unsigned long' is 64 bits and the high byte has its top
bit set, then C's implicit conversion from 'unsigned char' to 'int'
for the shift will result in an unintended sign extension which sets
the top 32 bits in 'inst'.  Add casts to prevent this.  (Spotted by
Coverity, CID 10054016.)

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 1488556233-31246-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org

Don't define TRUE and FALSE locally or manually include stdio.h;
instead use osdep.h which provides them.

This is a necessary prerequisite for moving to "everywhere includes
osdep.h", because otherwise there is a compile error due to the
redefinition of TRUE and FALSE.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 1453831531-667-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org

Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

A number of files were including strings.h but not using any
of the functions it provides

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

Warnings from the Sparse static analysis tool:

disas/microblaze.c:289:3: warning:
 symbol 'opcodes' was not declared. Should it be static?
disas/microblaze.c:570:6: warning:
 symbol 'register_prefix' was not declared. Should it be static?
disas/microblaze.c:571:6: warning:
 symbol 'special_register_prefix' was not declared. Should it be static?
disas/microblaze.c:572:6: warning:
 symbol 'fsl_register_prefix' was not declared. Should it be static?
disas/microblaze.c:573:6: warning:
 symbol 'pvr_register_prefix' was not declared. Should it be static?

Remove the unused variable special_register_prefix.
The variable pvr_register_prefix was unused, too, but can be used.
Add also 'const' where possible.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

This patch adds more printf format checking.

Additional modifications were needed for this code change:

* alpha-dis.c: The local definition of MAX conflicts with
  a previous definition from osdep.h, so add an #undef.

* dis-asm.h: Add include for fprintf_function (qemu-common.h).
  The standard (now redundant) includes are removed.

* mis-dis.c: The definition of ARRAY_SIZE is no longer needed
  and must be removed (conflict with previous definition from
  qemu-common.h).

* sh4-dis.c: Remove some unneeded forward declarations.

Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Using GCC-4.2.4-1ubuntu4, there is a warning:
	microblaze-dis.c:792: warning: unused variable 'fprintf'

Indeed, fprintf() is shadowed by a custom redefinition but is not used because
of FORTIFY_SOURCE option which replace calls to fprintf() by fprintf_chk().
So, fprintf refers to the libc implementation instead of the qemu one.
It's a bug.

It is fixed by renaming the variable to something different of "fprintf".
It prevents from hazardous shadowing.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

This fix the following build failure:

  CC    libdis-user/microblaze-dis.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
microblaze-dis.c: In function 'print_insn_microblaze':
microblaze-dis.c:829: warning: format '%04x' expects type 'unsigned int',
but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
microblaze-dis.c:962: warning: format '%04x' expects type 'unsigned int',
but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'

Reported-at: http://www.monstr.eu/wiki/doku.php?id=log:2010-04-13_12_10_00



Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>

See also 8167ee88,
530e7615 and
fad6cb1a.

Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>

This brings bfd_boolean to the wonderful world of <stdbool.h>, it is needed
because it defines bdf_boolean as an enum with values true and false,
and some architectures use TRUE, FALSE and give problems when you try to use
<stdbool.h>

Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>