Using bdrv_replace_node() for removing filter is not good enough: it
keeps child reference of the filter, which may conflict with original
top node during permission update.

Instead let's create new interface, which will do all graph
modifications first and then update permissions.

Let's modify bdrv_replace_node_common(), allowing it additionally drop
backing chain child link pointing to new node. This is quite
appropriate for bdrv_drop_intermediate() and makes possible to add
new bdrv_drop_filter() as a simple wrapper.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-24-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-23-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

bdrv_append is not very good for inserting filters: it does extra
permission update as part of bdrv_set_backing_hd(). During this update
filter may conflict with other parents of top_bs.

Instead, let's first do all graph modifications and after it update
permissions.

append-greedy-filter test-case in test-bdrv-graph-mod is now works, so
move it out of debug option.

Note: bdrv_append() is still only works for backing-child based
filters. It's something to improve later.

Note2: we use the fact that bdrv_append() is used to append new nodes,
without backing child, so we don't need frozen check and inherits_from
logic from bdrv_set_backing_hd().

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-22-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Split part of bdrv_replace_node_common() to be used separately.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-21-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Split no-perm part of bdrv_attach_child as separate transaction action.
It will be used in later commits.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-20-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Split out no-perm part of bdrv_root_attach_child() into separate
transaction action. bdrv_root_attach_child() now moves to new
permission update paradigm: first update graph relations then update
permissions.

qsd-jobs test output updated. Seems now permission update goes in
another order. Still, the test comment say that we only want to check
that command doesn't crash, and it's still so.

Error message is a bit misleading as it looks like job was added first.
But actually in new paradigm of graph update we can't distinguish such
things. We should update the error message, but let's not do it now.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-19-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

inore_children thing doesn't help to track all propagated permissions
of children we want to ignore. The simplest way to correctly update
permissions is update graph first and then do permission update. In
this case we just referesh permissions for the whole subgraph (in
topological-sort defined order) and everything is correctly calculated
automatically without any ignore_children.

So, refactor bdrv_replace_node_common to first do graph update and then
refresh the permissions.

Test test_parallel_exclusive_write() now pass, so move it out of
debugging "if".

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-18-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

To be used in the following commit.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-17-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Add new interface, allowing use of existing node list. It will be used
to fix bdrv_replace_node() in the further commit.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-16-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Refactor calling driver callbacks to a separate transaction action to
be used later.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-15-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Rewrite bdrv_check_perm(), bdrv_abort_perm_update() and bdrv_set_perm()
to update nodes in topological sort order instead of simple DFS. With
topologically sorted nodes, we update a node only when all its parents
already updated. With DFS it's not so.

Consider the following example:

    A -+
    |  |
    |  v
    |  B
    |  |
    v  |
    C<-+

A is parent for B and C, B is parent for C.

Obviously, to update permissions, we should go in order A B C, so, when
we update C, all parent permissions already updated. But with current
approach (simple recursion) we can update in sequence A C B C (C is
updated twice). On first update of C, we consider old B permissions, so
doing wrong thing. If it succeed, all is OK, on second C update we will
finish with correct graph. But if the wrong thing failed, we break the
whole process for no reason (it's possible that updated B permission
will be less strict, but we will never check it).

Also new approach gives a way to simultaneously and correctly update
several nodes, we just need to run bdrv_topological_dfs() several times
to add all nodes and their subtrees into one topologically sorted list
(next patch will update bdrv_replace_node() in this manner).

Test test_parallel_perm_update() is now passing, so move it out of
debugging "if".

We also need to support ignore_children in
bdrv_parent_perms_conflict()

For test 283 order of conflicting parents check is changed.

Note also that in bdrv_check_perm() we don't check for parents conflict
at root bs, as we may be in the middle of permission update in
bdrv_reopen_multiple(). bdrv_reopen_multiple() will be updated soon.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-14-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Each of them has only one caller. Open-coding simplifies further
pemission-update system changes.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-13-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

We are going to drop recursive bdrv_child_* functions, so stop use them
in bdrv_child_try_set_perm() as a first step.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-12-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Split out non-recursive parts, and refactor as block graph transaction
action.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-11-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Add additional check that node parents do not interfere with each
other. This should not hurt existing callers and allows in further
patch use bdrv_refresh_perms() to update a subtree of changed
BdrvChild (check that change is correct).

New check will substitute bdrv_check_update_perm() in following
permissions refactoring, so keep error messages the same to avoid
unit test result changes.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-10-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Add simple transaction API to use in further update of block graph
operations.

Supposed usage is:

- "prepare" is main function of the action and it should make the main
  effect of the action to be visible for the following actions, keeping
  possibility of roll-back, saving necessary things in action state,
  which is prepended to the action list (to do that, prepare func
  should call tran_add()). So, driver struct doesn't include "prepare"
  field, as it is supposed to be called directly.

- commit/rollback is supposed to be called for the list of action
  states, to commit/rollback all the actions in reverse order

- When possible "commit" should not make visible effect for other
  actions, which make possible transparent logical interaction between
  actions.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-9-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

These functions are called only from bdrv_reopen_multiple() in block.c.
No reason to publish them.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Passing parent aio context is redundant, as child_class and parent
opaque pointer are enough to retrieve it. Drop the argument and use new
bdrv_child_get_parent_aio_context() interface.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Add new handler to get aio context and implement it in all child
classes. Add corresponding public interface to be used soon.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

We have too much comments for this feature. It seems better just don't
do it. Most of real users (tests don't count) have to create additional
reference.

Drop also comment in external_snapshot_prepare:
 - bdrv_append doesn't "remove" old bs in common sense, it sounds
   strange
 - the fact that bdrv_append can fail is obvious from the context
 - the fact that we must rollback all changes in transaction abort is
   known (it's the direct role of abort)

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

bdrv_append() is not quite good for inserting filters: it does extra
permission update in intermediate state, where filter get it filtered
child but is not yet replace it in a backing chain.

Some filters (for example backup-top) may want permissions even when
have no parents. And described intermediate state becomes invalid.

That's (half a) reason, why we need "inactive" state for backup-top
filter.

bdrv_append() will be improved later, now let's add a unit test.

Now test fails, so it runs only with -d flag. To run do

  ./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/append-greedy-filter

from <build-directory>/tests.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Add test to show that simple DFS recursion order is not correct for
permission update. Correct order is topological-sort order, which will
be introduced later.

Consider the block driver which has two filter children: one active
with exclusive write access and one inactive with no specific
permissions.

And, these two children has a common base child, like this:

┌─────┐     ┌──────┐
│ fl2 │ ── │ top  │
└─────┘     └──────┘
  │           │
  │           │ w
  │           ▼
  │         ┌──────┐
  │         │ fl1  │
  │         └──────┘
  │           │
  │           │ w
  │           ▼
  │         ┌──────┐
  └───────

 │ base │
            └──────┘

So, exclusive write is propagated.

Assume, we want to make fl2 active instead of fl1.
So, we set some option for top driver and do permission update.

If permission update (remember, it's DFS) goes first through
top->fl1->base branch it will succeed: it firstly drop exclusive write
permissions and than apply them for another BdrvChildren.
But if permission update goes first through top->fl2->base branch it
will fail, as when we try to update fl2->base child, old not yet
updated fl1->base child will be in conflict.

Now test fails, so it runs only with -d flag. To run do

  ./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-perm-update

from <build-directory>/tests.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Add the test that shows that concept of ignore_children is incomplete.
Actually, when we want to update something, ignoring permission of some
existing BdrvChild, we should ignore also the propagated effect of this
child to the other children. But that's not done. Better approach
(update permissions on already updated graph) will be implemented
later.

Now the test fails, so it's added with -d argument to not break make
check.

Test fails with

 "Conflicts with use by fl1 as 'backing', which does not allow 'write' on base"

because when updating permissions we can ignore original top->fl1
BdrvChild. But we don't ignore exclusive write permission in fl1->base
BdrvChild, which is propagated. Correct thing to do is make graph
change first and then do permission update from the top node.

To run test do

  ./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-exclusive-write

from <build-directory>/tests.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Commit 1901b496 changed the nvme device from using a bar exclusive
for MSI-x to sharing it on bar0.

Unfortunately, the msix_uninit_exclusive_bar() call remains in
nvme_exit() which causes havoc when the device is removed with, say,
device_del. Fix this.

Additionally, a subregion is added but it is not removed on exit which
causes a reference to linger and the drive to never be unlocked.

Fixes: 1901b496 ("hw/block/nvme: move msix table and pba to BAR 0")
Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

We can remove PAGE_WRITE when (internally) marking a page read-only
because it contains translated code. This can get confused when we are
executing signal return code on signal stacks.

Fixes: e56552cf ("target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit")
Found-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20210422154427.13038-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

There could be case that peer is NULL. This can happen when during
network device hot-add where net device needs to be added first. So
the patch check the existence of peer before trying to do the pad.

Fixes: 969e50b6 ("net: Pad short frames to minimum size before sending from SLiRP/TAP")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Message-id: 20210423031803.1479-1-jasowang@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Commit 54aa3de7 ("qapi: Use QAPI_LIST_PREPEND() where possible")
inadvertently removed the has_dependencies from the partition disk
info, resulting in empty list being returned.

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950833



Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20210420125831.233092-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

When adding this file and its new content in commit 3f7a9278
("target/mips: LSA/DLSA R6 decodetree helpers") I did 2 mistakes:

1: Listed authors who haven't been involved in its development,
2: Used an incorrect GNU GPLv2 license text (using 'and' instead
   of 'or').

Instead of correcting the GNU GPLv2 license text, replace the license
by the 'GNU LGPL v2.1 or later' one, to be coherent with the other
translation files in the target/mips/ folder.

Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210420100633.1752440-1-f4bug@amsat.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Result @blocked is true when and only when result @blocked-reasons is
present.  It's always non-empty when present.  @blocked is redundant.
It was introduced in commit 3af8554b "migration: Add blocker
information", and has not been released.  This gives us a chance to
fix the interface with minimal fuss.

Unfortunately, we're already too close to the release to risk dropping
it.  Deprecate it instead.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20210420051907.891470-1-armbru@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

While processing SCSI i/o requests in mptsas_process_scsi_io_request(),
the Megaraid emulator appends new MPTSASRequest object 'req' to
the 's->pending' queue. In case of an error, this same object gets
dequeued in mptsas_free_request() only if SCSIRequest object
'req->sreq' is initialised. This may lead to a use-after-free issue.

Since s->pending is actually not used, simply remove it from
MPTSASState.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Cheolwoo Myung <cwmyung@snu.ac.kr>
Message-id: 20210419134247.1467982-1-f4bug@amsat.org
Message-Id: <20210416102243.1293871-1-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Cheolwoo Myung <cwmyung@snu.ac.kr>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1914236

 (CVE-2021-3392)
Fixes: e351b826 ("hw: Add support for LSI SAS1068 (mptsas) device")
[PMD: Reworded description, added more tags]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Fixes for rc4:
 * Fix compile failures of C++ files with new glib headers
 * mps3-an547: Use correct Cortex-M55 CPU and don't disable its FPU
 * accel/tcg: Fix assertion failure executing from non-RAM with -icount

# gpg: Signature made Sat 17 Apr 2021 20:39:58 BST
# gpg:                using RSA key E1A5C593CD419DE28E8315CF3C2525ED14360CDE
# gpg:                issuer "peter.maydell@linaro.org"
# gpg: Good signature from "Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>" [ultimate]
# gpg:                 aka "Peter Maydell <pmaydell@gmail.com>" [ultimate]
# gpg:                 aka "Peter Maydell <pmaydell@chiark.greenend.org.uk>" [ultimate]
# Primary key fingerprint: E1A5 C593 CD41 9DE2 8E83  15CF 3C25 25ED 1436 0CDE

* remotes/pmaydell/tags/pull-target-arm-20210417:
  accel/tcg: avoid re-translating one-shot instructions
  target/arm: drop CF_LAST_IO/dc->condjump check
  hw/arm/armsse: Make SSE-300 use Cortex-M55
  hw/arm/armsse: Give SSE-300 its own Property array
  include/qemu/osdep.h: Move system includes to top
  osdep: protect qemu/osdep.h with extern "C"
  osdep: include glib-compat.h before other QEMU headers

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

By definition a single instruction is capable of being an IO
instruction. This avoids a problem of triggering a cpu_io_recompile on
a non-recorded translation which then fails because it expects
tcg_tb_lookup() to succeed unconditionally. The normal use case
requires a TB to be able to resolve machine state.

The other users of tcg_tb_lookup() are able to tolerate a missing TB
if the machine state has been resolved by other means - which in the
single-shot case is always true because machine state is synced at the
start of a block.

Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210415162454.22056-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

This is a left over erroneous check from the days front-ends handled
io start/end themselves. Regardless just because IO could be performed
on the last instruction doesn't obligate the front end to do so.

This fixes an abort faced by the aspeed execute-in-place support which
will necessarily trigger this state (even before the one-shot
CF_LAST_IO fix). The test still seems to hang once it attempts to boot
the Linux kernel but I suspect this is an unrelated issue with icount
and the timer handling code.

The original intention of the cpu_abort (added in commit 2e70f6ef
when the icount stuff was first added) seems to have been to act as
an assert() to catch an unhandled corner case where the generated code
would be something like:
    conditional branch to condlabel if its cc failed
    implementation of the insn (a conditional branch or trap)
    code emitted by gen_io_end()
 condlabel:
    gen_goto_tb or equivalent thing to go to next insn

At runtime the cc-failed case would skip over the code emitted by
gen_io_end(), leaving the can_do_io flag incorrectly set.

In commit ba3e7926 we switched to an implementation which
always clears can_do_io at the start of the following TB instead
of trying to clear it at the end of a TB that did IO. So the corner
case that this cpu_abort() was trying to flag is no longer possible,
because the gen_io_end() call has been deleted. We can therefore
safely remove the no-longer-valid assertion.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210416170207.12504-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org
Cc: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

The SSE-300 has a Cortex-M55 (which was the whole reason for us
modelling it), but we forgot to actually update the code to let it
have a different CPU type from the IoTKit and SSE-200.  Add CPU type
as a field for ARMSSEInfo instead of hardcoding it to always use a
Cortex-M33.

Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1923861


Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210416104010.13228-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org

SSE-300 currently shares the SSE-200 Property array. This is
bad principally because the default values of the CPU0_FPU
and CPU0_DSP properties disable the FPU and DSP on the CPU.
That is correct for the SSE-200 but not the SSE-300.
Give the SSE-300 its own Property array with the correct
SSE-300 specific settings:
 * SSE-300 has only one CPU, so no CPU1* properties
 * SSE-300 CPU has FPU and DSP

Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1923861


Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210415182353.8173-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org

Mostly osdep.h puts the system includes at the top of the file; but
there are a couple of exceptions where we include a system header
halfway through the file.  Move these up to the top with the rest
so that all the system headers we include are included before
we include os-win32.h or os-posix.h.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210416135543.20382-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Message-id: 20210414184343.26235-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org