While trying to get my head around the nest of interactions for vhost
devices I though I could start by documenting the key API functions.
This patch documents the main API hooks for creating and starting a
vhost device as well as how the configuration changes are handled.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-11-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

While writing my own VirtIO devices I've gotten confused with how
things are structured and what sort of shared infrastructure there is.
If we can document how everything is supposed to work we can then
maybe start cleaning up inconsistencies in the code.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220309164929.19395-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org>

Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-10-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

This is useful for more human readable debug messages in vhost-user
programs.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-9-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Make the language about feature negotiation explicitly clear about the
handling of the VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES feature bit. Try and
avoid the sort of bug introduced in vhost.rs REPLY_ACK processing:

  https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost/pull/24



Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Jiang Liu <gerry@linux.alibaba.com>
Message-Id: <20210226111619.21178-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org>

Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-8-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

This matches the nomenclature that is generally used.  Also commonly used
is client/server, but it is not as clear because sometimes the front-end
exposes a passive (server) socket that the back-end connects to.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210226143413.188046-4-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-7-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

This section is using the word "back-end" to refer to the
"slave's back-end", and talking about the "client" for
what the rest of the document calls the "slave".

Rework it to free the use of the term "back-end", which in
the next patch will replace "slave".

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210226143413.188046-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-6-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

It is not necessary to mention which side is sending/receiving
each payload; it is more interesting to say which is the request
and which is the reply.  This also matches what vhost-user-gpu.rst
already does.

While at it, ensure that all messages list both the request and
the reply payload.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210226143413.188046-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-5-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>

These are useful when trying to debug the initial vhost-user
negotiation, especially when it hard to get logging from the low level
library on the other side.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200925125147.26943-6-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-3-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

This allows other device classes that will be exposed via PCI to be
able to do so in the appropriate hw/ directory. I resisted the
temptation to re-order headers to be more aesthetically pleasing.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200925125147.26943-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org>

Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-2-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

"0x200000000" is much more readable than "8589934592".
The change saves one step (conversion) while debugging.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Message-Id: <20220318140440.596019-1-i.maximets@ovn.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>

We need to update iq_dw according to the DMA_IRQ_REG during post
load. Otherwise we may get wrong IOTLB invalidation descriptor after
migration.

Fixes: fb43cf73 ("intel_iommu: scalable mode emulation")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220317080522.14621-2-jasowang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

We need check whether passthrough is enabled during
vtd_switch_address_space() by checking the context entries. This
requires the root_scalable to be set correctly otherwise we may try to
check legacy rsvd bits instead of scalable ones.

Fixing this by updating root_scalable before switching the address
spaces during post_load.

Fixes: fb43cf73 ("intel_iommu: scalable mode emulation")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220317080522.14621-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

According to vtd spec v3.3 3.14:

"""
Software must not program paging-structure entries to remap any
address to the interrupt address range. Untranslated requests and
translation requests that result in an address in the interrupt range
will be blocked with condition code LGN.4 or SGN.8.
"""

This patch blocks the request that result in interrupt address range.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220210092815.45174-2-jasowang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

This fault reason is not used and is duplicated with SPT.2 condition
code. So let's remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220210092815.45174-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

We don't need to check kvm_enable_x2apic(). It's perfectly OK to support
interrupt remapping even if we can't address CPUs above 254. Kind of
pointless, but still functional.

The check on kvm_enable_x2apic() needs to happen *anyway* in order to
allow CPUs above 254 even without an IOMMU, so allow that to happen
elsewhere.

However, we do require the *split* irqchip in order to rewrite I/OAPIC
destinations. So fix that check while we're here.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Message-Id: <20220314142544.150555-4-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

We should probably check if we were meant to be exposing IR, before
letting the guest turn the IRE bit on.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220314142544.150555-3-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

By setting none of the SAGAW bits we can indicate to a guest that DMA
translation isn't supported. Tested by booting Windows 10, as well as
Linux guests with the fix at https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/c40aaaac10



Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220314142544.150555-2-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

The check on x86ms->apic_id_limit in pc_machine_done() had two problems.

Firstly, we need KVM to support the X2APIC API in order to allow IRQ
delivery to APICs >= 255. So we need to call/check kvm_enable_x2apic(),
which was done elsewhere in *some* cases but not all.

Secondly, microvm needs the same check. So move it from pc_machine_done()
to x86_cpus_init() where it will work for both.

The check in kvm_cpu_instance_init() is now redundant and can be dropped.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Message-Id: <20220314142544.150555-1-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Coverity rightly reports that is not free in that case.

Fixes: Coverity CID 1487559
Fixes: 100890f7 ("vhost: Shadow virtqueue buffers forwarding")

Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220512175747.142058-7-eperezma@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Per https://discourse.gnome.org/t/port-your-module-from-g-memdup-to-g-memdup2-now/5538



  The old API took the size of the memory to duplicate as a guint,
  whereas most memory functions take memory sizes as a gsize. This
  made it easy to accidentally pass a gsize to g_memdup(). For large
  values, that would lead to a silent truncation of the size from 64
  to 32 bits, and result in a heap area being returned which is
  significantly smaller than what the caller expects. This can likely
  be exploited in various modules to cause a heap buffer overflow.

Replace g_memdup() by the safer g_memdup2() wrapper.

Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220512175747.142058-6-eperezma@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

With the introduction of MQ the index of the vq needs to be calculated
with the device model vq_index.

Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220512175747.142058-5-eperezma@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Fixes: 6d0b2226 ("vdpa: Adapt vhost_vdpa_get_vring_base to SVQ")

Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220512175747.142058-4-eperezma@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Only the first one of them were properly enqueued back.

Fixes: 100890f7 ("vhost: Shadow virtqueue buffers forwarding")

Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220512175747.142058-3-eperezma@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

The device could have access to modify them, and it definitely have
access when we implement packed vq. Harden SVQ maintaining a private
copy of the descriptor chain. Other fields like buffer addresses are
already maintained sepparatedly.

Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220512175747.142058-2-eperezma@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Provide an introduction to the main components of a CXL system,
with detailed explanation of memory interleaving, example command
lines and kernel configuration.

This was a challenging document to write due to the need to extract
only that subset of CXL information which is relevant to either
users of QEMU emulation of CXL or to those interested in the
implementation.  Much of CXL is concerned with specific elements of
the protocol, management of memory pooling etc which is simply
not relevant to what is currently planned for CXL emulation
in QEMU.  All comments welcome

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-43-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Add CXL Fixed Memory Windows to the CXL tests.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-40-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Tables that differ from normal Q35 tables when running the CXL test.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-39-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

The DSDT includes several CXL specific elements and the CEDT
table is only present if we enable CXL.

The test exercises all current functionality with several
CFMWS, CHBS structures in CEDT and ACPI0016/ACPI00017 and _OSC
entries in DSDT.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-38-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Add exceptions for the DSDT and the new CEDT tables
specific to a new CXL test in the following patch.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-37-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Add the CFMWs memory regions to the memorymap and adjust the
PCI window to avoid hitting the same memory.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-36-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Add a trivial handler for now to cover the root bridge
where we could do some error checking in future.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-35-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

These memops perform interleave decoding, walking down the
CXL topology from CFMWS described host interleave
decoder via CXL host bridge HDM decoders, through the CXL
root ports and finally call CXL type 3 specific read and write
functions.

Note that, whilst functional the current implementation does
not support:
* switches
* multiple HDM decoders at a given level.
* unaligned accesses across the interleave boundaries

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-34-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Once a read or write reaches a CXL type 3 device, the HDM decoders
on the device are used to establish the Device Physical Address
which should be accessed.  These functions peform the required maths
and then use a device specific address space to access the
hostmem->mr to fullfil the actual operation.  Note that failed writes
are silent, but failed reads return poison.  Note this is based
loosely on:

https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200817161853.593247-6-f4bug@amsat.org/


[RFC PATCH 0/9] hw/misc: Add support for interleaved memory accesses

Only lightly tested so far.  More complex test cases yet to be written.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-33-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Accessor to get hold of the cxl state for a CXL host bridge
without exposing the internals of the implementation.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-32-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Simple function to search a PCIBus to find a port by
it's port number.

CXL interleave decoding uses the port number as a target
so it is necessary to locate the port when doing interleave
decoding.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-31-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

This adds code to instantiate the slightly extended ACPI root port
description in DSDT as per the CXL 2.0 specification.

Basically a cut and paste job from the i386/pc code.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-30-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

The CEDT CXL Fixed Window Memory Window Structures (CFMWs)
define regions of the host phyiscal address map which
(via an impdef means) are configured such that they have
a particular interleave setup across one or more CXL Host Bridges.

Reported-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-29-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

The concept of these is introduced in [1] in terms of the
description the CEDT ACPI table. The principal is more general.
Unlike once traffic hits the CXL root bridges, the host system
memory address routing is implementation defined and effectively
static once observable by standard / generic system software.
Each CXL Fixed Memory Windows (CFMW) is a region of PA space
which has fixed system dependent routing configured so that
accesses can be routed to the CXL devices below a set of target
root bridges. The accesses may be interleaved across multiple
root bridges.

For QEMU we could have fully specified these regions in terms
of a base PA + size, but as the absolute address does not matter
it is simpler to let individual platforms place the memory regions.

ExampleS:
-cxl-fixed-memory-window targets.0=cxl.0,size=128G
-cxl-fixed-memory-window targets.0=cxl.1,size=128G
-cxl-fixed-memory-window targets.0=cxl0,targets.1=cxl.1,size=256G,interleave-granularity=2k

Specifies
* 2x 128G regions not interleaved across root bridges, one for each of
  the root bridges with ids cxl.0 and cxl.1
* 256G region interleaved across root bridges with ids cxl.0 and cxl.1
with a 2k interleave granularity.

When system software enumerates the devices below a given root bridge
it can then decide which CFMW to use. If non interleave is desired
(or possible) it can use the appropriate CFMW for the root bridge in
question.  If there are suitable devices to interleave across the
two root bridges then it may use the 3rd CFMS.

A number of other designs were considered but the following constraints
made it hard to adapt existing QEMU approaches to this particular problem.
1) The size must be known before a specific architecture / board brings
   up it's PA memory map.  We need to set up an appropriate region.
2) Using links to the host bridges provides a clean command line interface
   but these links cannot be established until command line devices have
   been added.

Hence the two step process used here of first establishing the size,
interleave-ways and granularity + caching the ids of the host bridges
and then, once available finding the actual host bridges so they can
be used later to support interleave decoding.

[1] CXL 2.0 ECN: CEDT CFMWS & QTG DSM (computeexpresslink.org / specifications)

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> # QAPI Schema
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-28-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Both registers and the CFMWS entries in CDAT use simple encodings
for the number of interleave ways and the interleave granularity.
Introduce simple conversion functions to/from the unencoded
number / size.  So far the iw decode has not been needed so is
it not implemented.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-27-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>