checkpatch: volatile with a comment or sig_atomic_t is okay
This assumes that the comment gives some justification; "volatile sig_atomic_t" is also self-explanatory and usually correct. Discussed in: '[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] dump-guest-memory.py: fix "You can't do that without a process to debug"' Suggested-by:Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171215181810.4122-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment