Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 3176990f authored by Alex Bennée's avatar Alex Bennée
Browse files

tests/qtests: clean-up and fix leak in generic_fuzz


An update to the clang tooling detects more issues with the code
including a memory leak from the g_string_new() allocation. Clean up
the code to avoid the allocation and use ARRAY_SIZE while we are at
it.

Reviewed-by: default avatarRichard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230630180423.558337-9-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
parent 9ea2e69f
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -954,17 +954,10 @@ static void register_generic_fuzz_targets(void)
.crossover = generic_fuzz_crossover
});
GString *name;
const generic_fuzz_config *config;
for (int i = 0;
i < sizeof(predefined_configs) / sizeof(generic_fuzz_config);
i++) {
config = predefined_configs + i;
name = g_string_new("generic-fuzz");
g_string_append_printf(name, "-%s", config->name);
for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(predefined_configs); i++) {
const generic_fuzz_config *config = predefined_configs + i;
fuzz_add_target(&(FuzzTarget){
.name = name->str,
.name = g_strconcat("generic-fuzz-", config->name, NULL),
.description = "Predefined generic-fuzz config.",
.get_init_cmdline = generic_fuzz_predefined_config_cmdline,
.pre_fuzz = generic_pre_fuzz,
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment