-
Thomas Huth authored
Some files claim that the code is licensed under the GPL, but then suddenly suggest that the user should have a look at the LGPL. That's of course non-sense, replace it with the correct GPL wording instead. Signed-off-by:
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1548255083-8190-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> Signed-off-by:
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Thomas Huth authoredSome files claim that the code is licensed under the GPL, but then suddenly suggest that the user should have a look at the LGPL. That's of course non-sense, replace it with the correct GPL wording instead. Signed-off-by:
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1548255083-8190-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> Signed-off-by:
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>