-
Anthony Liguori authored
In the very least, a change like this requires discussion on the list. The naming convention is goofy and it causes a massive merge problem. Something like this _must_ be presented on the list first so people can provide input and cope with it. This reverts commit 99a0949b. Signed-off-by:
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Anthony Liguori authoredIn the very least, a change like this requires discussion on the list. The naming convention is goofy and it causes a massive merge problem. Something like this _must_ be presented on the list first so people can provide input and cope with it. This reverts commit 99a0949b. Signed-off-by:
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>