-
Daniel P. Berrangé authored
This validates that we correctly handle multifd migration success and failure scenarios when using TLS with x509 certificates. There are quite a few different scenarios that matter in relation to hostname validation, but we skip a couple as we can assume that the non-multifd coverage applies to some extent. Signed-off-by:
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220426160048.812266-9-berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by:
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>Daniel P. Berrangé authoredThis validates that we correctly handle multifd migration success and failure scenarios when using TLS with x509 certificates. There are quite a few different scenarios that matter in relation to hostname validation, but we skip a couple as we can assume that the non-multifd coverage applies to some extent. Signed-off-by:
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220426160048.812266-9-berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by:
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Loading