-
Paolo Bonzini authored
We had two copies of a ffs function for longs with subtly different semantics and, for the one in bitops.h, a confusing name: the result was off-by-one compared to the library function ffsl. Unify the functions into one, and solve the name problem by calling the 0-based functions "bitops_ctzl" and "bitops_ctol" respectively. This also fixes the build on platforms with ffsl, including Mac OS X and Windows. Signed-off-by:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Tested-by:
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Tested-by:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by:
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>Paolo Bonzini authoredWe had two copies of a ffs function for longs with subtly different semantics and, for the one in bitops.h, a confusing name: the result was off-by-one compared to the library function ffsl. Unify the functions into one, and solve the name problem by calling the 0-based functions "bitops_ctzl" and "bitops_ctol" respectively. This also fixes the build on platforms with ffsl, including Mac OS X and Windows. Signed-off-by:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Tested-by:
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Tested-by:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by:
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Loading