-
Stefan Hajnoczi authored
bdrv_co_drain() has not been used since commit 9a0cec66 ("mirror: use bdrv_drained_begin/bdrv_drained_end") in 2016. Remove it so there are fewer drain scenarios to worry about. Use bdrv_drained_begin()/bdrv_drained_end() instead. They are "mixed" functions that can be called from coroutine context. Unlike bdrv_co_drain(), these functions provide control of the length of the drained section, which is usually the right thing. Signed-off-by:
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220521122714.3837731-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by:
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>Stefan Hajnoczi authoredbdrv_co_drain() has not been used since commit 9a0cec66 ("mirror: use bdrv_drained_begin/bdrv_drained_end") in 2016. Remove it so there are fewer drain scenarios to worry about. Use bdrv_drained_begin()/bdrv_drained_end() instead. They are "mixed" functions that can be called from coroutine context. Unlike bdrv_co_drain(), these functions provide control of the length of the drained section, which is usually the right thing. Signed-off-by:
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220521122714.3837731-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by:
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Loading