-
Daniel P. Berrangé authored
Back in 2018 we introduced support for killing the whole QEMU process instead of just one thread, when a seccomp rule is violated: commit bda08a57 Author: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Date: Wed Aug 22 19:02:48 2018 +0200 seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available Fast forward a year and we introduced a patch to avoid killing the process for resource control syscalls tickled by Mesa. commit 9a1565a0 Author: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Date: Wed Mar 13 09:49:03 2019 +0000 seccomp: don't kill process for resource control syscalls Unfortunately a logic bug effectively reverted the first commit mentioned so that we go back to only killing the thread, not the whole process. Signed-off-by:
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Acked-by:
Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com>Daniel P. Berrangé authoredBack in 2018 we introduced support for killing the whole QEMU process instead of just one thread, when a seccomp rule is violated: commit bda08a57 Author: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Date: Wed Aug 22 19:02:48 2018 +0200 seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available Fast forward a year and we introduced a patch to avoid killing the process for resource control syscalls tickled by Mesa. commit 9a1565a0 Author: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Date: Wed Mar 13 09:49:03 2019 +0000 seccomp: don't kill process for resource control syscalls Unfortunately a logic bug effectively reverted the first commit mentioned so that we go back to only killing the thread, not the whole process. Signed-off-by:
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Acked-by:
Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com>
Loading