-
Kevin Wolf authored
If we're already in a coroutine, there is no reason to use the synchronous version of block layer functions when a coroutine one exists. This makes bdrv_read/write/flush use bdrv_co_* when used inside a coroutine. Signed-off-by:
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>Kevin Wolf authoredIf we're already in a coroutine, there is no reason to use the synchronous version of block layer functions when a coroutine one exists. This makes bdrv_read/write/flush use bdrv_co_* when used inside a coroutine. Signed-off-by:
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Loading