-
Kevin Wolf authored
It's wrong to call BHs directly, even in tools. The only operations that schedule BHs are called in a loop that (indirectly) contains a call to qemu_bh_poll anyway, so we're not losing the scheduled BHs: Tools either use synchronous functions, which are guaranteed to have completed (including any BHs) when they return; or if they use asynchronous functions, they need to call qemu_aio_wait() or similar functions already today. Signed-off-by:
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>Kevin Wolf authoredIt's wrong to call BHs directly, even in tools. The only operations that schedule BHs are called in a loop that (indirectly) contains a call to qemu_bh_poll anyway, so we're not losing the scheduled BHs: Tools either use synchronous functions, which are guaranteed to have completed (including any BHs) when they return; or if they use asynchronous functions, they need to call qemu_aio_wait() or similar functions already today. Signed-off-by:
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Loading