-
Kevin Wolf authored
Whether a write cache is used or not is a decision that concerns the user (e.g. the guest device) rather than the backend. It was already logically part of the BB level as bdrv_move_feature_fields() always kept it on top of the BDS tree; with this patch, the core of it (the actual flag and the additional flushes) is also implemented there. Direct callers of bdrv_open() must pass BDRV_O_CACHE_WB now if bs doesn't have a BlockBackend attached. Signed-off-by:
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>Kevin Wolf authoredWhether a write cache is used or not is a decision that concerns the user (e.g. the guest device) rather than the backend. It was already logically part of the BB level as bdrv_move_feature_fields() always kept it on top of the BDS tree; with this patch, the core of it (the actual flag and the additional flushes) is also implemented there. Direct callers of bdrv_open() must pass BDRV_O_CACHE_WB now if bs doesn't have a BlockBackend attached. Signed-off-by:
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Loading