-
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy authored
We are generally moving to int64_t for both offset and bytes parameters on all io paths. Main motivation is realization of 64-bit write_zeroes operation for fast zeroing large disk chunks, up to the whole disk. We chose signed type, to be consistent with off_t (which is signed) and with possibility for signed return type (where negative value means error). So, convert now copy_range parameters which are already 64bit to signed type. It's safe as we don't work with requests overflowing BDRV_MAX_LENGTH (which is less than INT64_MAX), and do check the requests in bdrv_co_copy_range_internal() (by bdrv_check_request32(), which calls bdrv_check_request()). Signed-off-by:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20201211183934.169161-17-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by:
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by:
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy authoredWe are generally moving to int64_t for both offset and bytes parameters on all io paths. Main motivation is realization of 64-bit write_zeroes operation for fast zeroing large disk chunks, up to the whole disk. We chose signed type, to be consistent with off_t (which is signed) and with possibility for signed return type (where negative value means error). So, convert now copy_range parameters which are already 64bit to signed type. It's safe as we don't work with requests overflowing BDRV_MAX_LENGTH (which is less than INT64_MAX), and do check the requests in bdrv_co_copy_range_internal() (by bdrv_check_request32(), which calls bdrv_check_request()). Signed-off-by:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20201211183934.169161-17-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by:
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by:
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Loading