-
Peter Maydell authored
Since the only caller of page_unprotect() which might cause it to need to call cpu_resume_from_signal() is handle_cpu_signal() in the user-mode code, push the longjump handling out to that function. Since this is the only caller of cpu_resume_from_signal() which passes a non-NULL puc argument, split the non-NULL handling into a new cpu_exit_tb_from_sighandler() function. This allows us to merge the softmmu and usermode implementations of the cpu_resume_from_signal() function, which are now identical. Signed-off-by:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by:
Sergey Fedorov <sergey.fedorov@linaro.org>
Acked-by:
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Acked-by:
Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1463494687-25947-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.orgPeter Maydell authoredSince the only caller of page_unprotect() which might cause it to need to call cpu_resume_from_signal() is handle_cpu_signal() in the user-mode code, push the longjump handling out to that function. Since this is the only caller of cpu_resume_from_signal() which passes a non-NULL puc argument, split the non-NULL handling into a new cpu_exit_tb_from_sighandler() function. This allows us to merge the softmmu and usermode implementations of the cpu_resume_from_signal() function, which are now identical. Signed-off-by:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by:
Sergey Fedorov <sergey.fedorov@linaro.org>
Acked-by:
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Acked-by:
Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1463494687-25947-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Loading