-
Paolo Bonzini authored
Duplicate removal was added to extract-libs in order to avoid including the same library multiple times into the linking command line; this could potentially happen when using "foo.mo-libs" (which adds the library to all components, causing it to appear N times if the module is composed of N objects). However, sorting and removing duplicates causes problems with static linking, and also with space-separated linker options as found in some Mac OS X packaging systems. Furthermore, the "optimization" is really a non-problem since we do not expect .mo modules to be composed of many files. Reported-by:
Sean Bruno <sbruno@ignoranthack.me>
Tested-by:
Sean Bruno <sbruno@ignoranthack.me>
Reviewed-by:
Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1402929805-16836-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>Paolo Bonzini authoredDuplicate removal was added to extract-libs in order to avoid including the same library multiple times into the linking command line; this could potentially happen when using "foo.mo-libs" (which adds the library to all components, causing it to appear N times if the module is composed of N objects). However, sorting and removing duplicates causes problems with static linking, and also with space-separated linker options as found in some Mac OS X packaging systems. Furthermore, the "optimization" is really a non-problem since we do not expect .mo modules to be composed of many files. Reported-by:
Sean Bruno <sbruno@ignoranthack.me>
Tested-by:
Sean Bruno <sbruno@ignoranthack.me>
Reviewed-by:
Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1402929805-16836-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Loading