-
Andreas Färber authored
Commit a0e372f0 reorganized the register counting for GDB. While it seems correct not to let the total number of registers skyrocket in an SMP scenario through a static variable, the distinction between total register count and 'g' packet register count (last_reg vs. num_g_regs) got lost among the way. Fix this by introducing CPUState::gdb_num_g_regs and using that in gdb_handle_packet(). Reported-by:
Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org (stable-1.6)
Tested-by:
Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by:
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Tested-by:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by:
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>Andreas Färber authoredCommit a0e372f0 reorganized the register counting for GDB. While it seems correct not to let the total number of registers skyrocket in an SMP scenario through a static variable, the distinction between total register count and 'g' packet register count (last_reg vs. num_g_regs) got lost among the way. Fix this by introducing CPUState::gdb_num_g_regs and using that in gdb_handle_packet(). Reported-by:
Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org (stable-1.6)
Tested-by:
Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by:
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Tested-by:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by:
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Loading