-
Vasilis Liaskovitis authored
Currently visit_type_size checks if the visitor's type_size function pointer is NULL. If not, it calls it, otherwise it calls v->type_uint64(). But neither of these pointers are ever set. Fallback to calling v->type_int() in this third (default) case. Signed-off-by:
Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by:
Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by:
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Message-id: 1375109277-25561-6-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com
Signed-off-by:
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>Vasilis Liaskovitis authoredCurrently visit_type_size checks if the visitor's type_size function pointer is NULL. If not, it calls it, otherwise it calls v->type_uint64(). But neither of these pointers are ever set. Fallback to calling v->type_int() in this third (default) case. Signed-off-by:
Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by:
Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by:
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Message-id: 1375109277-25561-6-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com
Signed-off-by:
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Loading