-
Janosch Frank authored
The SCLP boundary cross check is done by the Ultravisor for a protected guest, hence we don't need to do it. As QEMU doesn't get a valid SCCB address in protected mode this is even problematic and can lead to QEMU reporting a false boundary cross error. Fixes: db13387c ("s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks") Reported-by:
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by:
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by:
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by:
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by:
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by:
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201022103135.126033-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by:
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>Janosch Frank authoredThe SCLP boundary cross check is done by the Ultravisor for a protected guest, hence we don't need to do it. As QEMU doesn't get a valid SCCB address in protected mode this is even problematic and can lead to QEMU reporting a false boundary cross error. Fixes: db13387c ("s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks") Reported-by:
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by:
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by:
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by:
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by:
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by:
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by:
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201022103135.126033-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by:
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Loading