Skip to content
  • Eric Blake's avatar
    130257dc
    char: Convert to new qapi union layout · 130257dc
    Eric Blake authored
    
    
    We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
    1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
    C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
    2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
    values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
    leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
    member's name.
    
    Make the conversion to the new layout for character-related
    code.
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
    Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-19-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
    [Commit message tweaked slightly]
    Signed-off-by: default avatarMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
    130257dc
    char: Convert to new qapi union layout
    Eric Blake authored
    
    
    We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
    1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
    C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
    2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
    values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
    leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
    member's name.
    
    Make the conversion to the new layout for character-related
    code.
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
    Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-19-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
    [Commit message tweaked slightly]
    Signed-off-by: default avatarMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Loading