-
Daniel P. Berrangé authored
When killing the subcommand, it is intended to first send SIGTERM, then SIGKILL and only report an error if it still doesn't die after SIGKILL. The 'step' counter was not being incremented though, so the code never got past the SIGTERM stage. Signed-off-by:
Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>Daniel P. Berrangé authoredWhen killing the subcommand, it is intended to first send SIGTERM, then SIGKILL and only report an error if it still doesn't die after SIGKILL. The 'step' counter was not being incremented though, so the code never got past the SIGTERM stage. Signed-off-by:
Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Loading